Trump patriots are happy to learn that House Republicans are seeking to limit judges’ power with a new bill against liberal activist judges who have sabotaged Trump administration policies through nationwide injunctions.
The No Rogue Rulings Act, advancing toward a floor vote, would curb the ability of individual district judges to impose their personal political agendas across the entire country.
Speaker Mike Johnson and House Republican leadership recognize the serious threat posed by activist judges who have repeatedly blocked legitimate executive actions, particularly during the Trump administration.
While many conservatives have called for the impeachment of these judges, GOP lawmakers are pursuing a more strategic legislative approach.
The bill, championed by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), would specifically target the practice of district judges issuing nationwide injunctions that affect parties not directly involved in the case before them.
These sweeping rulings have become a favorite tool of the left to obstruct conservative policies across the entire country based on a single judge’s opinion.
The problem has grown dramatically in recent years. During the Trump administration, liberal judges issued unprecedented nationwide injunctions, blocking everything from immigration enforcement to regulatory reforms.
The current situation with Judge James Boasberg blocking deportation flights has highlighted how a single unelected judge can hamstring national security efforts.
Moreover, the bill offers a constitutional solution to restore the proper power balance.
It has already advanced through the House Judiciary Committee under Chairman Jim Jordan’s leadership and appears to be on a fast track for consideration by the full House.
Issa emphasized the urgent need for this reform, stating:
“The malfunction of a critical part of our judiciary should be a concern to us all, and that’s why this bill is on a glide path to the floor. It’s a Constitutional solution to a national problem and an idea whose time has come.”
While Democrats like Jamie Raskin (D-MD) predictably oppose the measure, claiming it undermines judicial authority, nationwide injunctions were rare until recent decades.
Their dramatic increase coincides with the rise of judicial activism, which has increasingly substituted judges’ political preferences for actual legal interpretation.
Speaker Johnson has made clear that Republicans are not backing down, declaring:
“This is not the way the system is supposed to work. So we’re going to have hearings to highlight the abuses. I suspect that we may wind up questioning some of these judges themselves, to have them defend their actions.”
The push comes as Trump and others, including Elon Musk, have called for judicial impeachments.
Although that remains unlikely due to the high threshold required in the Senate, Johnson has emphasized that “everything is on the table” when it comes to addressing judicial overreach that threatens our constitutional system.
For Trump supporters who have watched helplessly as liberal judges in coastal cities repeatedly blocked common-sense policies on border security and immigration enforcement, this legislation represents a long-overdue check on judicial activism gone wild.
