In a new declaration by President Trump, he has stirred national debate with a groundbreaking proposal: deport violent criminals to El Salvador for imprisonment.
See the video below!
This audacious suggestion comes after a meeting at the White House with El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele.
The plan could redefine how America deals with repeat offenders, but legal experts warn it may violate constitutional rights.
The idea includes deporting individuals, even U.S. citizens, convicted of violent crimes.
Critics argue this would breach U.S. law, which offers no authority for deporting citizens to serve sentences abroad.
Despite this, Trump asserted the possibility, focusing on dangerous individuals like those threatening public safety, NBC News reports.
One prominent legal argument comes from David Bier, who insists, “U.S. citizens may not be deported to imprisonment abroad. There is no authority for that in any U.S. law.”
His viewpoint underscores the constitutional limitations inherent in such a proposal.
Trump’s suggestion aims to target repeat offenders, emphasizing that individuals who engage in heinous acts like assaulting the elderly have to face severe consequences.
During discussions with Nayib Bukele, Trump highlighted the construction of additional Salvadoran prisons to house these offenders.
The initiative could alleviate American correctional facilities while criticizing the current judicial system’s inefficiency, The New York Post points out in a report.
“We always have to obey the laws, but we also have homegrown criminals that push people into subways, that hit elderly ladies on the back of the head with a baseball bat when they’re not looking, that are absolute monsters. I’d like to include them,” President Trump said.
Concerns center around potential violations of due process and the risk of wrongful deportations.
The case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia illustrates these fears; he was mistakenly deported, revealing significant due process issues.
Legal experts caution that without judicial review, such policies could lead to significant human rights infringements.
The proposal faces significant constitutional hurdles, including past Supreme Court rulings that stress due process protections and limit presidential authority in foreign policy.
While the White House under secretary Karoline Leavitt confirms Trump’s consideration, the conversation’s legality remains dubious.
The courts have the onus to ensure American citizens’ rights are preserved.
Future legal battles will likely define this controversial policy’s fate, bringing due process and constitutional protections to the forefront.
Trump says he'd like to deport American citizens to a gulag in El Salvador: "I'd like to go a step further. I said to Pam, I don't know what the laws are, we always have to obey the laws, but we also have homegrown criminals that push people into subways … I'd like to include… pic.twitter.com/noStvA8JI8
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) April 14, 2025
