A dozen former FBI agents filed a federal lawsuit against Director Kash Patel and the Justice Department, claiming they were unlawfully terminated for kneeling during 2020 civil unrest to prevent riots—raising serious questions about political retaliation within America’s premier law enforcement agency.
Story Snapshot
- Twelve fired FBI agents sue Patel and DOJ, alleging termination for the 2020 kneeling incident during Floyd protests
- Agents claim they knelt tactically to de-escalate a dangerous confrontation and prevent violence
- Lawsuit alleges firings were politically motivated retaliation, not based on factual evaluation
- Multiple lawsuits now challenge Patel’s leadership, including cases from former Acting Director Brian Driscoll
Agents Claim Tactical Decision Prevented Violence
On June 4, 2020, FBI agents patrolling Washington D.C. encountered a volatile crowd containing both hostile individuals and families with children. The agents made a split-second tactical decision to kneel, which they argue successfully de-escalated the situation and prevented violence.
According to their lawsuit, the agents lacked proper riot control equipment like shields, gas masks, and helmets, forcing them to rely on unconventional crowd management techniques to maintain public safety.
Fired FBI agents file lawsuit against FBI director Kash Patel and DOJ, alleging unlawful retaliation https://t.co/iGxpsC863I
— CBSColorado (@CBSNewsColorado) December 9, 2025
Political Retaliation Allegations Target FBI Leadership
The terminated agents argue their firings represent partisan retaliation rather than legitimate disciplinary action. They cite Patel’s book “Government Gangsters,” where he advocated removing government employees who “won’t undermine the president’s agenda.”
The lawsuit specifically notes that Deputy Assistant Director Jane Doe 5, who oversaw counterintelligence operations, was personally removed by Patel’s direction solely because she kneeled during the 2020 incident, suggesting political considerations trumped operational expertise.
Experienced Counterterrorism Specialists Among Terminated
The fired agents include seasoned counterterrorism specialists and criminal investigators with over 15 years of experience protecting America. Their terminations raise concerns about institutional knowledge loss at a critical time when national security threats remain elevated.
Attorney Mary Dohrmann warned that “internal FBI processes are being subverted in a way that makes us all less safe,” highlighting how political considerations may be compromising the bureau’s operational effectiveness and professional standards.
Pattern of Legal Challenges Emerges Against FBI Leadership
This lawsuit represents the latest in a series of legal challenges confronting Patel’s leadership of the FBI. Former Acting Director Brian Driscoll has filed his own federal lawsuit challenging his termination, while another group of agents involved in Capitol riot investigations have also pursued legal action.
These multiple lawsuits suggest broader concerns within the FBI about political interference and retribution, potentially undermining morale and operational effectiveness at the nation’s premier law enforcement agency.
Constitutional Concerns Over Law Enforcement Politicization
The allegations raise fundamental questions about maintaining apolitical law enforcement in a constitutional republic. When FBI agents face termination for tactical decisions made during civil unrest, it creates dangerous precedents that could politicize future law enforcement responses.
The agents’ lawsuit argues they were fired not for operational failures but for perceived political disloyalty, a standard that threatens the independence and professionalism that Americans expect from federal law enforcement agencies tasked with protecting constitutional rights and public safety.
