Supreme Court RULES In Favor of DOGE – TWICE!

U.S. Supreme Court building under clear blue sky.

In a double victory for President Trump’s administration, the Supreme Court has issued two groundbreaking decisions favoring the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), marking a significant shift in the battle against federal bureaucracy.

See the tweet below!

Dogged by legal restrictions, DOGE can now access critical Social Security Administration systems, thanks to two emergency rulings by the conservative-majority court.

This victory empowers the Trump administration’s quest to modernize government and root out inefficiencies.

The Supreme Court’s decision, handed down on June 6, 2025, allows DOGE to finally dig into Social Security Administration data crucial for their reform efforts.

This conservative-majority ruling helps counter previous judicial roadblocks by dismantling requirements that hindered DOGE from fulfilling its purpose.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, along with Justices Sotomayor and Kagan, dissented, expressing concern about privacy risks for millions of Americans.

The court overturned an injunction from Maryland’s federal judge, allowing DOGE access to previously restricted agency records.

These are major wins for the Trump administration, who argued that strict limitations obstructed efforts to curb fraudulent welfare payments, especially those going to deceased individuals.

U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer argued these constraints interfered with the agenda to cut wasteful spending.

While criticism grows from opponents fearing data misuse, the White House celebrates this judicial action as triumph for efficient governance.

White House spokesperson Liz Huston stated, “The Supreme Court allowing the Trump Administration to carry out commonsense efforts to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse and modernize government information systems is a huge victory for the rule of law.”

Meanwhile, DOGE’s aim has been clear all along: to modernize outdated systems and detect waste and fraud.

Critics, such as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, expressed disappointment but acknowledged the opportunity for discovery to continue.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson voiced skepticism about the urgency claimed by the government to access this data.

Beyond data access, the Supreme Court allowed DOGE to shield itself from certain Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

This move further solidifies legal backing for DOGE, which was initially established by Elon Musk.

While Musk’s time with the government recently ended, this latest milestone ensures DOGE’s continued work to scrutinize public spending, citing the importance of addressing fraudulent payments, including to deceased beneficiaries.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has been a vocal critic, arguing that allowing DOGE unfettered access comes with “grave privacy risks for millions.”

These accusations, however, are countered by the majority that believe efficient government requires expeditious modernization, an effort the Supreme Court now supports.

The Supreme Court’s recent decisions outline a path for Trump’s DOGE to continue its mission.

With less red tape restricting access, the vision for a sensible, streamlined federal system comes within reach for taxpayers who demand their government operate without waste and inefficiency.