Sen. Fetterman BREAKS RANKS – Democrats ‘Often Wrong’!

John Fetterman speaking at podium.

In a surprising move that defies party lines, Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman has endorsed President Trump’s military action against Iran, and declared that the Democrat Party was “often wrong” on the matter.

See the tweet below!

As the contentious issue unfolds, Fetterman’s stance highlights a growing divide within the Democrat Party over national security and foreign policy, leaving many questioning whether traditional partisan loyalties are shifting in response to evolving global threats.

Senator John Fetterman expressed his unwavering support for President Trump’s missile strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Speaking on Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” Fetterman took a definitive stance, challenging the conventional views of his fellow Democrats.

He argued that the strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites at Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan were not only justified but necessary to curb threats from Iran.

Fetterman’s support marked a significant departure from his party, which has generally critiqued military action under President Trump.

He has been consistent in advocating for aggressive actions against Iran, echoing a sentiment that aligns with a more hawkish national security approach.

According to Fetterman, the strikes were a “very limited military exercise,” distinguishing them from full-scale warfare, thus arguing they did not require congressional approval.

“There’s going to be a lot of people in my party that are going to disagree with the strike in Iran, and I actually support that. I’ve been always calling for that thing. I think it was entirely appropriate,” the senator said.

He further elaborated on how previous Democrat decisions regarding Middle Eastern conflicts, like advocating for a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas conflict, were misguided.

Fetterman believes such hesitations allowed hostile regimes to gain ground.

Now, after the strikes, he observed that Israel holds air supremacy over Iran, further supporting his stance as necessary for regional stability.

Fetterman’s criticized elements within his own party that instinctively oppose any initiatives Steered by President Trump.

“Just because sometimes it’s… a decision that President Trump did, it’s like maybe, reflexively, you have to be opposed to that. For me, again, I’ve been always calling to destroy these nuclear facilities,” he stated, emphasizing his unwavering position on dismantling Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

With the influences of global nuclear threats becoming increasingly concerning, Fetterman’s break from Democrat norms is drawing attention across political lines.

A recent Fox News poll highlighted that 78% of Americans express concern about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, lending some public support to Fetterman’s position.

Such cross-party endorsements signify a complex landscape where party allegiance doesn’t necessarily dictate policy perspectives on critical security issues.